<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panel #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/</link>
	<description>Pronounce the dot.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b.rox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Beyond Jena</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-294897</link>
		<dc:creator>b.rox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Beyond Jena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-294897</guid>
		<description>[...] idea for this event came out of two panels in 2007: one that I was on and one that I organized. In a sense this event combines those two. That first panel was sponsored by Communications, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea for this event came out of two panels in 2007: one that I was on and one that I organized. In a sense this event combines those two. That first panel was sponsored by Communications, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-151935</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-151935</guid>
		<description>As an audience member at the panel I want to say thank you to Bart (for putting this together) and to the panelists (for their insights).  As a non-blogger I found the panel very compelling and I have visited all your blogs since.  Thanks for expanding my perspective!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an audience member at the panel I want to say thank you to Bart (for putting this together) and to the panelists (for their insights).  As a non-blogger I found the panel very compelling and I have visited all your blogs since.  Thanks for expanding my perspective!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifton Harris</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150822</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifton Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-150822</guid>
		<description>I think Maitri&#039;s answer to this question summed up how I feel about it. From my perspective I think finding the blogosphere has been a catalyst for me to explore my expressive side. I consider blogs to be a channel for people without access to mainstream media to tell their story. I tend to not read blogs connected with major media outlets because they are just an extension of the same media that doesn&#039;t represent my views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Maitri&#8217;s answer to this question summed up how I feel about it. From my perspective I think finding the blogosphere has been a catalyst for me to explore my expressive side. I consider blogs to be a channel for people without access to mainstream media to tell their story. I tend to not read blogs connected with major media outlets because they are just an extension of the same media that doesn&#8217;t represent my views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150427</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-150427</guid>
		<description>I believe this question was most adequately answered a few years ago in this document:

http://mama.indstate.edu/users/bones/WhyIHateWebLogs.html

Ever since I first came across it, I&#039;ve tried my best to live up to the standards laid out therein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this question was most adequately answered a few years ago in this document:</p>
<p><a href="http://mama.indstate.edu/users/bones/WhyIHateWebLogs.html" rel="nofollow">http://mama.indstate.edu/users/bones/WhyIHateWebLogs.html</a></p>
<p>Ever since I first came across it, I&#8217;ve tried my best to live up to the standards laid out therein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oyster</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150376</link>
		<dc:creator>oyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-150376</guid>
		<description>Blogs do matter (sometimes), and will increasingly fulfill their potential to &quot;matter&quot; more and more, in all kinds of ways that maitri mentioned in the above post.

For example, in politics, blogs helped build a furor over a campaign incident in Virginia that helped a Democratic candidate barely edge a favored GOP candidate, and the balance of the Senate was tipped.

Campaigns at all levels use and read blogs, MUCH more than bloggers might assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs do matter (sometimes), and will increasingly fulfill their potential to &#8220;matter&#8221; more and more, in all kinds of ways that maitri mentioned in the above post.</p>
<p>For example, in politics, blogs helped build a furor over a campaign incident in Virginia that helped a Democratic candidate barely edge a favored GOP candidate, and the balance of the Senate was tipped.</p>
<p>Campaigns at all levels use and read blogs, MUCH more than bloggers might assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maitri</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150366</link>
		<dc:creator>Maitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-150366</guid>
		<description>Both of those final questions are related.  Blogging indeed matters because of its inherent &quot;democratizing&quot; tendencies, if you mean the word in the sense of the free flow of ideas and taking the punditry of the fourth estate down a notch.  N.B.: We are not here to replace traditional media, but to supplement, enhance and keep them honest.

That said, the onus is on us to keep the larger blogosphere as well as its smaller communities, like the NOLA bloggers, open for communication.  This has philosophical and technical aspects.  This means looking beyond the Big 10 or Big 50 blogs for perspectives and journalistic finds; otherwise it&#039;s like reading the Top 10 papers or watching various TV stations.  It&#039;s true that the wisdom of a crowd is something to heed, but people as a tendency look for expert opinions all in the same place, when they are really strewn everywhere.  Technically, this requires a search of the internet for those blogs and discussions and not simply clicking on the same blogs in your Favorites everyday.

Furthermore, the real discussions live in the Comments sections of posts which, in their current form, require elevation.  It is often the case that the comments often supersede the original post in depth and latitude.

In my opinion, the blogosphere does continue to reflect social inequities in that not all communities have a voice, know of the power of blogs or care to communicate in this manner.  Whatever the case, we lose a viewpoint that is critical to a democratic discussion.  It is very critical to realize that blogs are not the be-all and end-all, just like newspapers and TV news, because democratization in this case is not a far-reaching thing.

In closing, blogs are collectively a great boon, but not a panacea - if you write consistently and moderately well, read other blogs and leave intelligent questions or comments on them and come to this tool (yes, it&#039;s only a tool) with a mindset of wanting to learn more and participate, a dialogue will happen, which is the end requirement here.  Before this medium, yelling at the TV and thinking you were the only one was the norm.  However, now that we have this utility, it is our responsibility to keep, grow and share it with a conscience, which makes it like democracy, society, neighborhood, media or any such social construct we&#039;ve come up with over the ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of those final questions are related.  Blogging indeed matters because of its inherent &#8220;democratizing&#8221; tendencies, if you mean the word in the sense of the free flow of ideas and taking the punditry of the fourth estate down a notch.  N.B.: We are not here to replace traditional media, but to supplement, enhance and keep them honest.</p>
<p>That said, the onus is on us to keep the larger blogosphere as well as its smaller communities, like the NOLA bloggers, open for communication.  This has philosophical and technical aspects.  This means looking beyond the Big 10 or Big 50 blogs for perspectives and journalistic finds; otherwise it&#8217;s like reading the Top 10 papers or watching various TV stations.  It&#8217;s true that the wisdom of a crowd is something to heed, but people as a tendency look for expert opinions all in the same place, when they are really strewn everywhere.  Technically, this requires a search of the internet for those blogs and discussions and not simply clicking on the same blogs in your Favorites everyday.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the real discussions live in the Comments sections of posts which, in their current form, require elevation.  It is often the case that the comments often supersede the original post in depth and latitude.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the blogosphere does continue to reflect social inequities in that not all communities have a voice, know of the power of blogs or care to communicate in this manner.  Whatever the case, we lose a viewpoint that is critical to a democratic discussion.  It is very critical to realize that blogs are not the be-all and end-all, just like newspapers and TV news, because democratization in this case is not a far-reaching thing.</p>
<p>In closing, blogs are collectively a great boon, but not a panacea &#8211; if you write consistently and moderately well, read other blogs and leave intelligent questions or comments on them and come to this tool (yes, it&#8217;s only a tool) with a mindset of wanting to learn more and participate, a dialogue will happen, which is the end requirement here.  Before this medium, yelling at the TV and thinking you were the only one was the norm.  However, now that we have this utility, it is our responsibility to keep, grow and share it with a conscience, which makes it like democracy, society, neighborhood, media or any such social construct we&#8217;ve come up with over the ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150331</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/11/02/panel-2/#comment-150331</guid>
		<description>Hey! Sophia&#039;s in town: http://www.pin-the-tail.com/?p=691</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Sophia&#8217;s in town: <a href="http://www.pin-the-tail.com/?p=691" rel="nofollow">http://www.pin-the-tail.com/?p=691</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

