<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panel #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://b.rox.com/2007/10/30/panel-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/10/30/panel-1/</link>
	<description>Life in the Flood Zone</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A person</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/10/30/panel-1/#comment-150102</link>
		<dc:creator>A person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/10/30/panel-1/#comment-150102</guid>
		<description>About the East. There is the theory that either Clint Murchison or  Lady Bird Johnson owned the property.  After Betsy, LBJ gave the fed money to drain the East and allow the above to make some money. Seems like we shouldn't have spread out so much in a swamp.  Makes you wonder what is happening now. I try to watch it but is is mindboogling. Blakely as well a Nagin worry me as to there are no details, just requests for money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the East. There is the theory that either Clint Murchison or  Lady Bird Johnson owned the property.  After Betsy, LBJ gave the fed money to drain the East and allow the above to make some money. Seems like we shouldn&#8217;t have spread out so much in a swamp.  Makes you wonder what is happening now. I try to watch it but is is mindboogling. Blakely as well a Nagin worry me as to there are no details, just requests for money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mominem</title>
		<link>http://b.rox.com/2007/10/30/panel-1/#comment-150055</link>
		<dc:creator>mominem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.rox.com/2007/10/30/panel-1/#comment-150055</guid>
		<description>I hadn't quite connected the loss of population and the development of New Orleans East. That's an interesting observation.

I was aware that the development was encouraged partly to keep people from moving to other Parishes. In the beginning it was widely viewed as a way to keep New Orleans economically healthy, since few old cities had that much land availible for development.

It also increased racial separation as well. Many middle class blacks opted to move to The East, rather than elsewhere, as they achieved greater affluence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t quite connected the loss of population and the development of New Orleans East. That&#8217;s an interesting observation.</p>
<p>I was aware that the development was encouraged partly to keep people from moving to other Parishes. In the beginning it was widely viewed as a way to keep New Orleans economically healthy, since few old cities had that much land availible for development.</p>
<p>It also increased racial separation as well. Many middle class blacks opted to move to The East, rather than elsewhere, as they achieved greater affluence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
