Panel #1

October 30th, 2007 by Editor B

It’s been a couple weeks since I participated in a panel sponsored by Xavier University’s Communications Department. It was titled “Media, Communication and Community: Private and Public Interests in Rebuilding New Orleans.” On the panel with me was Sakura Kone of Common Ground; Jarvis DeBerry of the Times Picayune; Rebecca Snedeker, the filmmaker who made By Invitaton Only; and Nick Slie, who is co-founder/co-artistic director of Mondo Bizarro. It was moderated by Bruce France, the other Mondo Bizarro guy who also used to teach at Xavier.

Other than Kone, I’d never met any of these folks before. I was honored to be on the dais with them. Of course I’ve read DeBerry’s column in the TP for years, but I’ve never met him in person. Despite seeing his photo every other morning, I didn’t recognize him at first.

DeBerry also said something that got my attention. He talked about the history of New Orleans East. Apparently New Orleans began to lose population around the time that New Orleans East was developed, so that the city was actually expanding geographically even as it became less populous.

Fascinating trivia, but the point he wanted to make was this: Talk about shrinking the footprint does not equate to shrinking the population. That’s an important distinction. “Shrinking the footprint” is a phrase that raises the hackles on many a neck, at least in part because of the implicit assumption that a shrunken city is one to which all may not return.

Later, the conversation turned to property rights, with Kone talking about the high rate of home ownership in the Lower Nine and how nervous people were about losing their land. DeBerry made reference to an editorial that appeared in the Times-Picayune about a corner grocery overrun by rats. Of course, that editorial was written by me, and that gave me a good segue to talk about how very different the situation is in Mid-City compared to the Lower Nine. Irresponsible absentee landlords are a plague on our neighborhood, and we desperately need property owners held to account.

I enjoyed the experience of being on this panel. But after the event, I eavesdropped on DeBerry as he chatted with a Xavier student from Seattle. The student was not very impressed by the whole affair. I didn’t listen long enough to get the whole gist, but he seemed to think the panel would have been more engaging with someone like Jay-Z on it.


Parenthesis Eye was there and took some notes.

3 Responses to “Panel #1”

  1. mominem Says:

    I hadn’t quite connected the loss of population and the development of New Orleans East. That’s an interesting observation.

    I was aware that the development was encouraged partly to keep people from moving to other Parishes. In the beginning it was widely viewed as a way to keep New Orleans economically healthy, since few old cities had that much land availible for development.

    It also increased racial separation as well. Many middle class blacks opted to move to The East, rather than elsewhere, as they achieved greater affluence.

  2. A person Says:

    About the East. There is the theory that either Clint Murchison or Lady Bird Johnson owned the property. After Betsy, LBJ gave the fed money to drain the East and allow the above to make some money. Seems like we shouldn’t have spread out so much in a swamp. Makes you wonder what is happening now. I try to watch it but is is mindboogling. Blakely as well a Nagin worry me as to there are no details, just requests for money.

  3. b.rox » Blog Archive » Beyond Jena Says:

    […] idea for this event came out of two panels in 2007: one that I was on and one that I organized. In a sense this event combines those two. That first panel was sponsored […]

Leave a Reply